I given my view points on the Dryden’s essay of the Dramatic Poesy.

I given my view points on the Dryden’s essay of the Dramatic Poesy:-

1) Do you any difference between Aristotle's definition of Tragedy and Dryden's definition of Play?

 Ans:-Yes, I see the difference between the Aristotle’s tragedy and Dryden play.   In  the  below  we  can  say  that   there  are  vast  difference  between  both  of  the  definition  Aristotle tragedy and Dryden play .

Definition of tragedy :- tragedy is  a  imitation of an  action  that is a serious, complete and a certain magnitude ,in a language  embellished with  each kind of  artistic  ornament , the several kinds  being  found in separate part of the play.

  Dryden’s definition of play: -
           The play is an ‘image’ of ‘human nature', and that the image is 'just' as well as 'lively'. It is 'just' because it is  basically true , and it is also ' lively' for  it  is  more 'heightened' and  beautiful reproduction.The Dryden 's essay make it  quite clear  that  he  lay more emphasis on the ' liveliness' of the image then of its 'justness'.

2) If you are supposed to give your personal predilection, would you be on the side of the Ancient or the Modern? Please give reasons.

 Ans:- I  am read  the  controversy  between   modern and  the  ancient when anyone  ask  a  question that  which  side  you are  going    ancient or the modern so I   am  give the  answer that  I am  going on the  side  of   ancient  because   ancient is not made the language so the  modern not  write  anything   about the  literature. I am agree  that   the modern  writer is  present  more   realistic  view  than the  ancient.
Ex. The film like baby, ramleela, rajneeti, haider this film create controversy  because  their modern  film writer  presenting reality of the society.so the modern  filmwriter  is  address  the  things  which  is  happens  around  in   the  world  and  their  point  of  view  more  realistic than the ancient.their purpose to presenting real not aritifical.        
  The  ancient  is superior  than  the modren  because the modren is  imitate  many  thing    which  is  established  by  the ancient. the   famouse  epic   ‘mahabharata’  written by vedvyas  in ancient time but bhash is a famouse poet of sanskrit literture who has  written many drama like urubhagam, raghuvansham,karnbharam etc .bhash is highly inspired by vedvyas mahabharata and he is bring the drama from mahabharata.His  drama  imitate by the mahabhata. I am agree that he is interpret  of his own but the major things  is taking  of the mahabhara .so we can say that most of the modren writer is imitate of the ancient.It is true that he is add the thing which is not seen in the epic but he is get the idea from the  ancient  epic.

3 ) Do you think that the arguments presented in favour of the French plays and against English plays are appropriate? (Say for example, Death should not be performed as it is neither 'just' not 'liely' image, displaying duel fight with blunted swords, thousands of soldiers marching represented as five on stage, mingling of mirth and serious, multiple plots etc.)

  Ans:- Yes, I am favour of the French playwright because the French drama is superior to the English drama. They faithfully observed the rule of the ancient and they are followed three unity of time, place and action. the French play the entire action is limited to one place and their plays are not the over burden with the subplots. The French narration is better managed and more skilful than the english.The French is avoid the representation of scene of bloodshed, violence and murder on the stage. So I am favour the French playwright than English playwright.

4)  I am not agree of with the poetic dialogues because in the poetic language, the reader and the common man is read of this, it is hard of them to read this and understand properly. I understand that the poetic language is hide  the deeper meaning of the play but it is diffcult to  understand the common man and the reader. they are not understand what the poet is said in the play. The poet is presenting the rhyme, rhythm, lyrics,sonnent vrry beautifully portrayed but it create complexity the mind of the reader and the comman man.